M-audio pulsar ii

M-audio pulsar ii

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Discussion.M-Audio Pulsar II |

 

The Pulsar II is a straightforward end-fire, cardioid ‘stick’ microphone, and is built with a 3/4-inch diameter, six-micron gold-sputtered Mylar diaphragm. The pill is housed in a brass human anatomy that is 22mm in diameter, with a complete amount of mm, and weighs g. There is a built-in shockmount system to isolate the pill from any body vibration. A great pair. Matched set microphones are critical for quality noise imaging. Carefully selected for his or her almost identical response, matched sets of Pulsar II microphones from M-Audio deliver superior stereo pe Show More. The Pulsar II is a reasonable cardioid pencil condenser available individually or in coordinated sets. The mic features a 3/4” diameter, 6-micron evaporated-gold diaphragm, with transformerless course A FET circuitry. dB pad and 80Hz high-pass filter can be obtained via small, recessed switches on the microphone human anatomy.

 

M-audio pulsar ii.Review: M-Audio Pulsar II :

The Pulsar™ II Matched Pair delivers a boxed set of Pulsar II small-capsule condenser microphones which are within +/-1dB of each and every other—from 20Hz to 20kHz. Developed in the united states because of the designers associated with the multi-award-winning Sputnik™, the distinctive-sounding Pulsar II is hand put together in small quantities to insure peak performance.3/5(3). The Pulsar II is a reasonable cardioid pencil condenser available individually or in coordinated sets. The mic functions a 3/4” diameter, 6-micron evaporated-gold diaphragm, with transformerless class A FET circuitry. dB pad and 80Hz high-pass filter can be obtained via tiny, recessed switches in the microphone human anatomy. Carefully selected for their nearly identical response, matched pairs of Pulsar II microphones from M-Audio ® deliver superior stereo performance. The brass figures have inner shockmounts and low-noise transformerless electronics. Each microphone offers a switchable 10 dB attenuation pad, plus an 80 Hz low-cut filter.
 
 
relevant:
Confirm your identity
Cardioid Pencil Condenser Microphone
Verify your identity
M-Audio Pulsar II
You’re here
M-Audio Pulsar II

Joe Albano on Feb 04, in Review 0 opinions. M-Audio is without question referred to as a company providing you with musicians and engineers with quality recording tools at costs anyone can afford, and their latest providing, the Pulsar II matched-pair stereo microphone set, goes on this tradition nicely. What exactly would you get for your modest financial investment?

The Pulsar IIs are small-diaphragm cardioid condenser mics, with Class A FET circuitry, consequently they are furnished as a frequency-response-matched set, making them ideal for stereo recording jobs like drum overheads, string ensembles, or stereo area mics.

But, there’s no reason not to ever make use of them independently since really, on classical guitar, percussion, or any other mono applications. The Pulsar IIs come packaged in a pleasant wood situation, along with mic videos, dirt covers, together with foam windscreens.

Additionally a stereo mic club, makes it possible for both mics becoming installed on just one stand, for stereo miking applications that keep consitently the mics close collectively. The Pulsar IIs accept standard volt Phantom Power, and should interface properly with any mic preamp.

On the mics themselves, you will find a 10 dB pad, and a hi-pass filter with a low-end cutoff of 80 Hz. As you care able to see from the graphs below, the Pulsar IIs have a mostly flat reaction, with a gentle increase between around 5 kHz and 12 kHz, and an extremely uniform cardioid response. But, even as we all know, specifications rarely tell your whole story, especially when it comes to microphones! So I put down to place all of them through their paces, both singly so when a stereo pair. I even did an assessment test more of a torture test, really with some studio mics well over the Pulsars’ small price.

So just how did they fare? I initially utilized an individual Pulsar II to record classical guitar plus some jangly percussion. Often, the weak area for condenser mics in this budget range could be the top end, which could often be just a little harsh. But, the Pulsars served up nice smooth highs, and an extremely natural overall balance. The sole poor area ended up being a tendency towards thinness'”too little heft when you look at the lows'”and a small midrange emphasis, though this could effortlessly be compensated for with EQ, if desired.

To put all of them in certain framework, I compared the Pulsar with an AKG which can be similar in sound to AKG’s classic , and an Audio-Technica , both also small-diaphragm mics, suitable for the exact same recording applications.

This strengthened my initial impressions'”the Pulsar II held a unique when you look at the top quality, with a complete stability that leaned much more to the mids, along with somewhat thinner lows.

During my tests, i did not view any excessive budget-mic harshness, even with the percussion. From the dreaded key test shaking tips in the front of a mic can reveal poor transient response the AKG maintained much more detail, but the Pulsar II did very well indeed, with just a really slight advantage to attest to its budget standing.

All in all, the distinctions are not great, specially considering that both comparison mics are at least three times the buying price of the Pulsar IIs! I recorded exactly the same devices in stereo, using the furnished stereo bar and spacer, with positive results. Both XY and ORTF positionings supplied an excellent feeling of openness, with great imaging of this specific percussion devices, no doubt due to the frequency-matching of the stereo set. The stereo club and spacer managed to get a cinch to get the mics lined up and angled perfect for stereo, and it is a really welcome inclusion, specially as of this price!

In both the stereo and mono tracks, the Pulsar II’s cardioid pattern was good at rejecting undesired sound into the back. At one point, I noticed a passing siren that I was sure would invade the recording, but in playback the track was clean adequate to use, despite having the mic about a foot from the tool. Therefore, overall, the Pulsar II mics, despite their ultra-low price point, deliver a level of performance that belies their budget condition.

I wouldn’t think twice to make use of them, even in combo with more costly mics and I’m a bit of a mic snob. Whether you’re property recordist with limited funds, or a professional which constantly seems to be a mic or two short for the session, specifically for stereo applications, the Pulsar IIs are certainly worth a look. Advantages: very good results for stereo recording at good deal point, frequency-matched set.

Much more articles by this writer. Joe is a musician, engineer, and producer in NYC. He’s also taught every aspect of recording and music technology at several NY sound schools, and it has been creating articles for Recording magaz study much more.

Create a free account or login to get started! Sound is your ultimate daily resource since the most recent report, reviews, tutorials and interviews for digital songs producers, by digital music manufacturers. Sign In Create Account. A NonLinear Educating Business. What is the catch? Joe Albano realizes. Joe Albano much more articles by this author.

Relevant Videos. Review: Accusonus Era Pro Bundle 5. Discussion Want to get in on the conversation? Featured Articles. Related Articles. Spotlight Courses. Groups News Reviews Tutorials Interviews. Cons: None at this price.

AMD was incorrect to eradicate the ATI brand name?
08.09.2021 [19:02],
Konstantin Khodakovsky

Fudzilla reporters, having satisfied with many people straight pertaining to the images market, report that almost all do not like the fact that AMD so sharply and demonstratively eliminated the ATI brand.

Many thought that AMD would slowly eliminate the ATI name with its services and products. For instance, it could be an excellent proceed to release the AMD Radeon HD 6000 show without any extra statements, but as well without mentioning ATI.

Numerous consider ATI’s brand becoming more powerful than AMD. For quite some time, ATI has been able to produce more successful products in the visuals card marketplace than AMD within the processor marketplace. While AMD is consistently when you look at the role of getting up with Intel, ATI features been able to win the 40nm fight with NVIDIA and attain a dominant position in the discrete layouts marketplace.

It’s possible to continue to talk about how AMD acted incorrectly, eliminating the ATI brand, nevertheless the organization has already officially outlined its last place on this concern. ATI disappeared, as performed the name 3dfx.

Related materials:

  • Leadtek video card considering a quartet of Toshiba SpursEngine chips;
  • Palit is organizing alternative variations of this GeForce GTS 450;
  • AMD prepares rebranding of HD6000 series graphics cards?;
  • an effort from AMD: a laptop computer without stickers.

a source:

  • fudzilla.com